MARCH 2025

Hello. This was March.

Mr. Penumbra’s 24-Hour Bookstore by Robin Sloan. The Great Sloan Re-Reading Spree continues! Second time reading this book, I think. Still love it, of course, but it’s probably my least favorite of his novels. Mostly because his hyper-idealized portrayal of Google always felt a little bit naive to me, even back when I first read it. And of course it can’t help but feel even more naive now, given the state of things. But that’s the progress of time for you. Sloan’s enthusiasm for technology and its infinite potential will never not be infectious, though, and his deep and abiding appreciation for traditional craftsmanship will always be aspirational.

Ajax Penumbra 1969 by Robin Sloan. Had read this one before, back when I first picked up Penumbra, but I confess that I have no real recollection of it, so this very much felt like reading it anew. I quite liked it, unsurprisingly enough. I think I enjoyed it more than the original novel, even? It had more of a swashbuckling adventure vibe that I was just really into. Also: lots of great names! Sloan is great at great names.

“Harriet Amber in the Conan Arcade” by Robin Sloan. Fairly sure no one can write chill, vibey, feel-good stories quite like Sloan. Or maybe they do, and I just don’t like ‘em as much. A sweet, droll little tale about life and how it’s never too late to change everything about it all..

“Author’s Note” by Robin Sloan. Another one of Sloan’s writing-with-large-language-models experiments—this one written with Wordcraft, Google’s AI-powered “writing assistant.” It’s successful in the sense that you can’t tell which words were written by Sloan and which ones were suggested by Wordcraft, I suppose, but fails by lacking Sloan’s usual stylistic flair and just by being an unsatisfying story overall.

I’m still deeply unconvinced by AI’s potential role in art (and even less so after Meta’s most recent fiasco), but Sloan is one of the few writers I know who is actively engaging with it—both technically and philosophically—in a way that feels prudent and circumspect. The complete opposite of what every single one of these callous, capitalistic conglomerates are currently doing, essentially.

Sloan is pretty good at this whole thinking about the internet thing, so I think his is a voice worth listening to.

“The Conspiracy Museum” by Robin Sloan. Again: Sloan is one of the most interesting and insightful writers/thinkers of the Internet Age. Had read this one before, but it apparently never registered that this was part of his burgeoning ““The Rock is President” universe because I cackled when I finally clocked it. 

Casino Royale by Ian Fleming. Another re-read because why the hell not? A great book dripping with atmosphere and stellar writing. Fleming penned some veritable bangers here.

Mathis opened the door and stopped on the threshold.

“Surround yourself with human beings, my dear James. They are easier to fight for than principles.”

He laughed. “But don’t let me down and become human yourself. We would lose such a wonderful machine.”

I first read this one back in 2023, before I had any real appreciation for these stories and the film franchise that followed, and so my notes for it were amusingly bare bones. Apparently I thought the first half was mostly fluff? Hilarious considering my current enthusiasm for this series. Ah, the naivete of youth. 

Could this be the beginning of another Great 007 Readthrough? I doubt it! I may pick some of my favorite stories back up, though. Or maybe I’ll continue with the continuation novels? Who knows! I don’t! I just follow my capricious whims!

“Octopussy” by Ian Fleming. Another of my favorite Bond stories—even though the man himself isn’t around for most of the thing. Really just a fascinating character study—both of the story’s protagonist, and of the author himself. This story was clearly written while Fleming was on the decline, health-wise, and his deep melancholy—that inescapable acedia—is positively palpable. It’s borderline autobiographical: It even takes place in Goldeneye.  

The Seventh by Richard Stark. Man, when Westlake was firing on all cylinders, he was unstoppable. I’ve enjoyed pretty much every Parker novel I’ve read, but I tend to really love the ones that have Parker teaming up with a large cast of characters. Despite his silent, stoic demeanor, he bounces off other people surprisingly well—particularly when they are lively little lowlives. Westlake knows this, so he doesn’t miss an opportunity to imbue pretty much every single supporting player with as much verve and flair as possible. This novel is chock-full of brilliantly particular and peculiar personalities, and it’s a pleasure to watch them all go—before they’re all suddenly and shockingly offed, of course.

The heist is a lot of fun, but—as is often the case with these novels—it’s the aftermath where the really interesting stuff happens. One of my favorites so far.

Tomorrow Never Dies by Raymond Benson. A surprisingly solid novelization of my favorite film from the Brosnan era. Really enjoyed Benson’s pulpy writing, even though it tended to get unnecessarily technical at times, letting the story get lost in the jargon of it all. Bond continuation writers tend to struggle when emulating Fleming’s flair for specificity, I’ve found. It wasn’t just naming the precise model of this gun or that particular class of ship that made Fleming’s writing engaging and appealing—it’s what those names and terms evoked. In Fleming’s case, it was almost always a sense of opulence and sophistication. Benson’s approach, more often than not, had all the dry, clinical air of a product launch—a far cry from the lavish, luxurious vibes we’ve come to expect from 007 stories.

Still, much like the film it’s based on, this was a hell of a lot of fun. I particularly liked the extra scenes and added details Benson included to help ground some of the film’s more outlandish aspects. And I appreciated his valiant attempt at weaving a coherent continuity between Fleming’s original Bond, the cinematic version, and his own take—even when it didn’t always make perfect sense.

And that was March. Bye.


BOOKS BOUGHT LOOK I AM GENUINELY TRYING BUT PANGOBOOKS IS PROBABLY THE BEST WORST THING THAT COULD HAVE EVER HAPPENED TO ME OKAY:

  • Coolest American Stories 2025 edited by Mark Wish, Elizabeth Coffey
  • The Collectors by Lorien Lawrence
  • The Best American Mystery and Suspense 2024 edited by S.A. Cosby
  • Carte Blanche by Jeffery Deaver
  • Die Another Day by Raymond Benson
  • Octopussy and the Living Daylights by Ian Fleming
  • Forever and a Death by Donald E. Westlake
  • James Bond: Choice of Weapons by Raymond Benson
  • James Bond: The Union Trilogy by Raymond Benson
  • This Beautiful, Ridiculous City by Kay Sohini

APRIL 2024

Oh hello, here’s what I read during April. Which was A Terrible Month in Any and All Aspects. But I digress. I didn’t have the headspace for much else so it was all, once again, pretty much all Bond. But I’m finally done with the Fleming books so maybe we’ll let that character take a break for a bit.

On Her Majesty’s Secret Service by Ian Fleming. Great story, but not my favorite. Which is surprising because this seems to be one of the more acclaimed entries. But I found Fleming’s writing, usually so vivid and robust, sloppy and middling for most of the thing. It made it clear to me that I had reached the point in the series where every subsequent book would dole out diminishing returns, and I was sadly right for the most part. It’s fascinating reading these, knowing something of Fleming’s life story. How his failing health colored so much of his writing during this period, how, expecting the inevitable, he seemed to be taking his outlandish self-insert of a protagonist to a gradual end as well. There’s a real, deep sense of melancholy with Bond in these last few novels. Accidie was the term Fleming liked to use—spiritual listlessness. It’s appropriate, I suppose—Bond began the series reeking of it, already willing to hang up his spurs halfway through Casino Royale, but this characteristic was progressively pushed to the back seat as the series went on getting bigger and more ambitious, mirroring Fleming’s own growing fortune and increasing playboy tendencies. But as his health continued to decline, so returned the acedia to the world of Bond. The ending of this novel is full of it, and it is a blunt and brutal and entirely tragic affair. And it’s to Fleming’s credit that these concluding chapters feature the novel’s most exciting and striking prose. All the time in the world, indeed.

I also watched and thoroughly enjoyed the film version of this. I was surprised by how faithful it was to its source material, too, and it made me wish Eon kept going down this route. Anyway, George Lazenby was a rad Bond and I will not hear otherwise.

The Jugger by Richard Stark. An attempt to break away from Bond. By going to another stoic scoundrel of a character lol. But this series is great and I want to continue with it. Apparently one of the weaker Parker novels, going by reviews, mostly because it shakes up the established formula – but I ended up liking it a lot precisely because it shook up the status quo. Parker is not dealing with the usual heist here, but a hang-up — although he goes about in the same exacting way he would a traditional caper. The central dilemma is small, almost domestic, but I still found it intriguing, particularly the chapters dealing with Captain Younger and how he learns about Sheer. Younger is the type of secondary character you would think would be a bore to read about, but Stark injects him with enough guile and shrewdness to make his point of view chapters fascinating. And, of course, it makes it all the more fun to read how Parker will inevitably get the better of him. Although not, as it turns out, without any repercussions. A very fun, surprisingly dark entry. 

The aforementioned unfavorable reviews I came across made me wonder if I was just something of a contrarian when it came to these older series, but I feel it’s probably more that I’ll always be more partial to underdogs (see: Lazenby). 

You Only Live Twice by Ian Fleming. I enjoyed this one, if mostly for the travelogue aspect, which, when not being horribly patronizing and racist, was actually fairly fascinating. The grounded realism of the earlier novels is long gone, though, replaced with Fleming’s liberal interpretations of the Saint George and the Dragon legend, which he seemed to be particularly fond of. It makes for some entertaining, albeit flimsy flights of fantasy. And while I enjoyed the sheer wildness of this story, for the most part I found the whole “Blofeld trilogy” disappointing. In particular with its central villain. Gone is the shadowy, menacing figure so brilliantly introduced in Thunderball, replaced by a boring, bombastic buffoon deserving of all the cartoon parodies that were to come. The book’s climax is also Fleming at his most unhinged, beginning with a truly bizarre fourth wall break, and ending with an incredibly unnecessary scene featuring the female lead going into a sex shop to try and get Bond’s mojo back. Staggeringly silly stuff, particularly when compared to the previous novel’s devastating denouement. 

The Man with the Golden Gun by Ian Fleming. The famously unfinished novel. I actually liked it quite a bit, first-draft feeling and all. The middle bits are contrived as hell, but the opening and ending feature some of that familiar Fleming finesse that long felt absent. There’s a lot more I wish could have been done with the book, but it’s all moot, since the long-suffering, eternally exhausted author died before ever doing a polishing pass on it. And so the last proper James Bond adventure can’t help but feel anticlimactic. Still, though, in spite of a weak latter half, these books are one hell of a run. And what a legacy to leave behind.

Octopussy and The Living Daylights by Ian Fleming. Bit of a down note on which to end this most thrilling of journeys. Still, not entirely disappointing. The two title stories are among the best of the Bond short stories. I was impressed by “Octopussy” in particular, mainly because of the intimacy of the material. It felt like Fleming at his most personal, and indeed, knowing his biography, it sometimes seemed like he was just writing about himself. A melancholy tale, full of regret and pulp and aplomb. In a lot of ways it is the quintessential Bond tale, despite the fact that the titular character doesn’t figure much into the plot. I also enjoyed “007 in New York,” for a lot of personal reasons. It’s very much an inconsequential tale where the most outrageous thing that happens is Bond sharing his decadent recipe for scrambled eggs. It’s much more of a lifestyle piece, and I always enjoyed reading about the life of this most particular of characters. I also found the abrupt ending absolutely hilarious. As if Fleming just went “Sod it, I can’t be bothered,” which is just highly relatable as a writer. One of my main takeaways from this series is that I found Fleming as a writer so endlessly fascinating. Playful and irreverent, one of those authors who you can really see is working the story out on the page. And it’s such a gift.

“Belle Mer” by Luanne Rice was this month’s short story. A provocative but kind of nothing story that never really goes anywhere. Surprisingly overwrought, despite the brief length.

READALIKES: MAD MEN

I rewatched the entirety of Mad Men a couple months ago. Because what better thing to do during lockdown than spend seven seasons with characters full of angst and ennui?

As is my wont, whenever I immerse myself into a show or film, I always get the urge to seek out some readalikes — books that, in my mind at least, share similarities with whatever it is I’m watching. My criteria for this is a little loose and ambiguous, admittedly: sometimes I look for similar moods and themes; oftentimes it’s just a matter of aesthetics. The last time I did this with Mad Men I ended up reading Christopher Isherwood’s A Single Man and Rona Jaffe’s The Best of Everything — books that read the part. This time around I thought it’d be fun to explore books that looked the part.

So I went with comics, of course. The ones I went with were perhaps not as deep and brooding as Mad Men, but they were certainly as stylish.

They were also mostly about murder, which is surprisingly common with stories set during this time, which makes me wonder what is about this certain period of American culture that fits so well with crime dramas and murder mysteries and thrillers? Is it the Hitchcock influence or is it that everyone was seemingly so repressed in those days that the thought of someone snapping only made one go, “well that was inevitable”?

In any case, I definitely consider it a genre (let’s call it Mid-Century Madness), and comics seem to do it better than almost anything else. And hardly any comic does it better than Darwyn Cooke’s adaptations of Donald E. Westlake’s Parker novels (written under the Richard Stark pseudonym), which follow the eponymous lead across heists, murderous plots, and other criminal activities. I had read — and deeply enjoyed — the first two books in the series, but this was my first time reading through all four volumes (Cooke sadly passed away before working on any more). Westlake’s Parker novels were famously cold, bare-boned affairs, featuring stark prose (hence the pen name) and simple, straightforward plots.

There’s a famous scene from the 1967 film Point Blank, one of the first adaptations of the the Parker stories. It features lead Lee Marvin walking down a hallway with deadly purpose. There’s no music playing, just the metronome-like sound of his steady footsteps, meant to evoke the relentless nature of the character. He sounds unstoppable — a bullet out of a gun.

It’s a rhythm that Cooke translated beautifully into comic book form. Throughout the books he uses wide panels, with little to no dialogue. And this, combined Cooke’s sleek and sharp artwork, evokes a sense of speed. Like Westlake’s original novels, these books are meant to be read quickly. There’s no real story development and certainly no character growth. As with any decent heist: you get in, you get out. The end. Like a bullet out of a gun.

Visually this is the most Mad Men-looking of the bunch, mostly due to Cooke’s general retro aesthetic, but also because Parker comes from the same squared-jawed, handsomely generic mold as Don Draper.

I read all four volumes in the series and had a blast with each one. The third volume, The Score, might just be my favorite, though.

○○○

Lady Killer, written by Joëlle Jones and Jamie S. Rich and illustrated by Jones herself, follows Josie Schuller, a seemingly perfect homemaker in a seemingly picture-perfect sixties household, who also happens to moonlight as a professional assassin. Hijinks ensue. (The series was pitched as “Betty Draper meets Hannibal,” but I think it’s more accurate to think of it as “Midge Maisel meets John Wick.”) This is essentially a dark comedy — emphasis on dark (morbid humor abounds). Joëlle Jones and Jamie S. Rich’s writing is perfectly sly and tongue-in-cheek and pairs well with Jones’ art, which manages to evoke the commercial art of the era while still retaining that modern edge.

There are only two volumes so far. I enjoyed the second one a lot more, mostly because it ramps up its California Cool aesthetic.

○○○

On the more serious end of the spectrum we have The Fade Out by Ed Brubaker and Sean Phillips, who pretty much have the crime corner of comics covered. This series owes a lot more to Old Hollywood lore and the visual flair of film noir than it does the sleek aesthetics of the mid-fifties. True to conventions, it tells the story of the tragic murder of a rising starlet. Unlike Parker and Lady Killer, this is played as straight as it could be, which is probably why I didn’t vibe with is as much. Brubaker’s writing is great, and Phillips’ art is fantastic, but it just didn’t speak to me as much as the rest of these readalikes so I don’t think I’ll be continuing it.